Hello and welcome to Back Alley Media.

Re: “They’re attacking me because I’m white”

Dillon and Sebastian posted on Geraldine Ferraro’s race-based slight of Obama today — and her inexplicable reiteration and defense of it later on.

I agree with Sebastian’s comment that it doesn’t look like the Clinton campaign sent Ferraro out there to make these remarks.

But it’s become another stunning example of how the Clintons work to polarize.   Notice the bizarre responses from camp Clinton today:  First, Wolfson says simply, “we disagree” with Ferraro; when pushed more, Clinton herself said the comment was “regrettable” but that both sides’ supporters have made overly personal comments; then, even more strangely, campaign manager Maggie Williams accuses Obama of playing the race card for calling out the comment; and finally — and most comically — when asked again later why why the Clinton campaign hadn’t simply rejected  Ferraro’s comments, Wolfson said they have ”made clear” that they do.

Huh?

What’s interesting is Wolfson’s use of past tense in saying the campaign “made clear” it rejected the comments — when of course it never did.  Hillary mildly distanced herself from them, and her campaign manager went on the attack to accuse Obama of interjecting race.  This way they succeed in fomenting the idea that Obama’s the one playing up race, all the while winking to whites who secretly (or openly) agree with Ferraro, and then when pressed with the comments head on, they say they “rejected them.”  I seriously wonder if, in the coming days (because I don’t think this will immediately go away), we will ever hear Hillary reject the comments in the present tense.  I doubt it.  It’s a strategy of fomenting racial resentment while painting anyone who calls out their game as inventing controversy, since they “made clear they rejected the comments.” 

The strategy is toxic.  I seriously hope superdelegates are recognizing the huge risks in letting this race go on, and are planning their move.  Between the “McCain’s more qualified” hit and now this, they can’t think this is going to end well. 

Posted on 12 March '08 by Suzanne, under Uncategorized.

7 Comments to “Re: “They’re attacking me because I’m white””

#1 Posted by Dillon (12.03.08 at 07:36 )

They handled a lot of their 1990s scandals in the same way - obfuscate and delay until such time as you can call them “old charges” that have already been dealt with.

#2 Posted by Sebastian (12.03.08 at 09:03 )

I’m not sure if it’s “wink-wink” as much as it is inability to admit/confront mistakes. The latter seems just as likely, if not more so, than the former — and of course has scary implications for what type of administration she would run. The Clintons and everyone they surround themselves with just instictively parse everything, I assume out of an abundance of caution.

#3 Posted by vshawnt (12.03.08 at 09:25 )

The longer this nomination process goes on, the more the comparisons I am able to find between the Clinton/Clinton camp and the Bush/Rove camp. Disturbing…especially because Obama looks to be vulnerable on the popular vote front now that FL & MI are in play (Almost 30m combined population which should yield ~5-7m in popular vote). Looks like there might be another 10-15m votes cast in this nomination process, in which case, Obama’s 700k popular vote advantage doesn’t look all that significant.

#4 Posted by Sebastian (12.03.08 at 11:32 )

As I read up on this more, I realize that Ferraro has essentially done the circuit of network morning news shows. The campaign could have cited its best interests and asked her not to do so, but clearly they do see some benefit in this stuff being hashed out. It all seems so gross.

#5 Posted by He’s Good | Back Alley Media (12.03.08 at 11:47 )

[…] Ferraro white/black uproar reaching a fever pitch, Obama himself, as always, has the perfect response: “I think if anybody was looking for the […]

#6 Posted by vshawnt (12.03.08 at 16:45 )

5:30pm - Ferraro steps down from Clinton campaign.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/12/ferraro.comments/index.html

#7 Posted by Pol70 (22.10.09 at 17:42 )

Did the candidate project an image of credibility based on experience, knowledge, presentation, and prior associations? ,